artifact_id: semiotic
rubric_version: 2.8.0
formula: baseline
judges:
- openai:gpt-5.6-terra
rows:
- criterion_id: DEL-01
  category: delivery
  checker: program
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 10
  points_earned: 10.0
  evidence: ''
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: DEL-02
  category: delivery
  checker: program
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -4.0
  evidence: 1 console errors
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: DEL-03
  category: delivery
  checker: program
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: ''
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: COR-01
  category: correctness
  checker: program
  verdict: na
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: the brief has no reference numbers
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: BRF-01
  category: answers_brief
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: 'Checked all six brief questions against visible dashboard elements: current status metrics;
    backlog charts; triage charts and oldest-first queue; work by area/adapter; epic completion table;
    requested issues and assignee chart.'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: BRF-02
  category: answers_brief
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Compared the page space used by brief-requested elements with elements outside the brief.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-01
  category: working
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked the full dashboard for a crash, error state, or broadly empty/loading panels.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-02
  category: working
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked every visible KPI card, chart, and table panel for blank states, errors, spinners,
    placeholders, or failed-load messages.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-01
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked the value-axis baselines of the stacked area chart and all visible horizontal and
    vertical bar charts.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-02
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Compared rate/share/% wording with the values and axes in the response-rate and epic-completion
    displays.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-03
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Compared repeated issue-type category colors across charts, including Feature, Bug, Task,
    and Other.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-04
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: na
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked charts for dual independent value axes and whether series-to-axis mappings were provided.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-05
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Compared the side-by-side open-issues-by-area and open-issues-by-adapter charts; each has
    its own visibly labeled value-axis ticks.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-06
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked line charts for connections between unordered categories. The visible line chart uses
    weekly dates in chronological order.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-01
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed all visible charts for pies/donuts, 3D forms, trends shown as tables or pies, and
    rankings shown as lines.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-02
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed the chart forms across the page for two or more charts that obscure their primary
    comparisons.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-03
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked multi-series/category charts, including the issue-type stacked area and bars, triage-age
    bars, area/adapter bars, and assignee bars, against their legends.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-04
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked categorical ranking order in “Open issues by area,” “Open issues by adapter,” “Open
    issues by assignee,” “Triage queue — oldest first,” “Open epics by % of sub-issues closed,” and “Most-requested
    open issues.”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-05
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked whether a lone value is unnecessarily rendered as a gauge or one-bar chart rather
    than shown directly.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-07
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Compared the visible charts for duplicated datasets presented in the same chart form.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-08
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -8.0
  evidence: “Opened vs closed per week” — the roughly 440 opened-issues spike around late May forces a
    scale near 450, making most ordinary weekly opened/closed bars comparatively difficult to read
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-06
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked the starts and ends of the visible time series (“Open issues over time,” “Opened vs
    closed per week,” and “New issues answered within 48 hours”) for sharp apparent partial-period artifacts;
    the weekly bar chart explicitly says “Complete weeks.”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-01
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed chart titles, axes, legends, tick labels, bar labels, and table text across the full-resolution
    tiles.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-02
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked all charts for text-overlap issues, including the time-series, bar charts, and progress
    tables.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-03
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed titles, labels, axis text, and table columns within each tile; text continuing at
    a boundary into the consecutive tile was not treated as cut off.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-04
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed full-resolution tiles for unreadably small or overly faint text, including supporting
    text, tick labels, chart legends, and tables.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-05
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed whether chart cards provide enough space to distinguish their bars, lines, and cells.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-01
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked all headline tiles, chart axes, legends, and table columns for rates, durations, currencies,
    and counts.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-02
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked titles, axes, legends, and table headers for exposed field names, codes, or placeholder
    text. Status values such as "awaiting_triage" were treated as displayed data categories.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-03
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked the page header and time-based labels for coverage and a reporting period.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-04
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -4.0
  evidence: '"OPEN ISSUES — 511" has no period for the current total; the only page-level as-of text is
    "Data as of [object Ob" | "AWAITING TRIAGE — 345" has no period for the current total; the only page-level
    as-of text is "Data as of [object Ob" | "CUSTOMER-REPORTED OPEN — 18" has no period for the current
    total; the only page-level as-of text is "Data as of [object Ob"'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-05
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked every visible chart and table for a descriptive title or label.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-07
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked visible percentages and rates for an explicit basis. The 48-hour-response chart says
    "By week opened; unanswered issues count as misses," and the epic table says "% of sub-issues closed."
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-08
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked chart titles, axis labels, legends, and plotted measures for unit or measure mismatches.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-09
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked headline figures against related charts and tables, including the 28-day opened/closed
    figures and net change.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-01
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -5.0
  evidence: '“Open issues by assignee” card: the chart occupies only the left portion of a full-width
    card, leaving a large unused region to its right.'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-02
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked card edges, row bottoms, and inter-card spacing across the KPI, chart, and table sections.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-04
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked whether detailed tables, filters, or minor visuals appear before or dominate the headline
    metrics and primary charts.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-05
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked whether borders, fills, shadows, headers, icons, or other decoration visually outweigh
    the displayed data.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-06
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked chart colors for unexplained, arbitrary, or misleading encodings.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-07
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked for placeholder text, debug output, test elements, or other unfinished scaffolding.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-01
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 10
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Page title, section headings, subtitles, and charts for a stated outcome supported by chart
    values.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-03
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 3
  points_earned: 3.0
  evidence: “OPEN ISSUES 511” with “+52 in 28 days” | “OPENED / CLOSED (28D) 123 / 71”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-04
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 6
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Charts for annotated events, target lines, or a deliberately highlighted focal mark/series.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-06
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 5
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Chart color treatment for neutral context data with a single accent reserved for the focal
    subject.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-07
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 4
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Multi-series charts for direct series labels at line ends, on marks, or on slices rather than
    reliance on legends.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-08
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 5
  points_earned: 5.0
  evidence: '“Open engine:v2 issues in dbt-labs/dbt-core (epics excluded unless noted)” | “Open at the
    end of each week, by type” | “Complete weeks; when closed > opened the backlog shrank” | “By week
    opened; unanswered issues count as misses” | “Open issues: triageable status:triage” | “Issues with
    several areas count in each” | “(none) = adapter-agnostic” | “Top 15, excluding unassigned” | “Ranked
    by reactions, then comments”'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
score: 0.487
category_scores:
  delivery: 0.6
  excellence: 0.242
agreement: 1.0
judge_errors: []
votes:
- criterion_id: BRF-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: 'Checked all six brief questions against visible dashboard elements: current status metrics;
    backlog charts; triage charts and oldest-first queue; work by area/adapter; epic completion table;
    requested issues and assignee chart.'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: BRF-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Compared the page space used by brief-requested elements with elements outside the brief.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked the full dashboard for a crash, error state, or broadly empty/loading panels.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked every visible KPI card, chart, and table panel for blank states, errors, spinners,
    placeholders, or failed-load messages.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked the value-axis baselines of the stacked area chart and all visible horizontal and
    vertical bar charts.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Compared rate/share/% wording with the values and axes in the response-rate and epic-completion
    displays.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Compared repeated issue-type category colors across charts, including Feature, Bug, Task,
    and Other.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: na
  evidence: Checked charts for dual independent value axes and whether series-to-axis mappings were provided.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Compared the side-by-side open-issues-by-area and open-issues-by-adapter charts; each has
    its own visibly labeled value-axis ticks.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked line charts for connections between unordered categories. The visible line chart uses
    weekly dates in chronological order.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed all visible charts for pies/donuts, 3D forms, trends shown as tables or pies, and
    rankings shown as lines.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed the chart forms across the page for two or more charts that obscure their primary
    comparisons.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked multi-series/category charts, including the issue-type stacked area and bars, triage-age
    bars, area/adapter bars, and assignee bars, against their legends.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked categorical ranking order in “Open issues by area,” “Open issues by adapter,” “Open
    issues by assignee,” “Triage queue — oldest first,” “Open epics by % of sub-issues closed,” and “Most-requested
    open issues.”
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked whether a lone value is unnecessarily rendered as a gauge or one-bar chart rather
    than shown directly.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Compared the visible charts for duplicated datasets presented in the same chart form.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-08
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “Opened vs closed per week” — the roughly 440 opened-issues spike around late May forces a
    scale near 450, making most ordinary weekly opened/closed bars comparatively difficult to read
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked the starts and ends of the visible time series (“Open issues over time,” “Opened vs
    closed per week,” and “New issues answered within 48 hours”) for sharp apparent partial-period artifacts;
    the weekly bar chart explicitly says “Complete weeks.”
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed chart titles, axes, legends, tick labels, bar labels, and table text across the full-resolution
    tiles.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked all charts for text-overlap issues, including the time-series, bar charts, and progress
    tables.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed titles, labels, axis text, and table columns within each tile; text continuing at
    a boundary into the consecutive tile was not treated as cut off.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed full-resolution tiles for unreadably small or overly faint text, including supporting
    text, tick labels, chart legends, and tables.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed whether chart cards provide enough space to distinguish their bars, lines, and cells.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked all headline tiles, chart axes, legends, and table columns for rates, durations, currencies,
    and counts.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked titles, axes, legends, and table headers for exposed field names, codes, or placeholder
    text. Status values such as "awaiting_triage" were treated as displayed data categories.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked the page header and time-based labels for coverage and a reporting period.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: '"OPEN ISSUES — 511" has no period for the current total; the only page-level as-of text is
    "Data as of [object Ob" | "AWAITING TRIAGE — 345" has no period for the current total; the only page-level
    as-of text is "Data as of [object Ob" | "CUSTOMER-REPORTED OPEN — 18" has no period for the current
    total; the only page-level as-of text is "Data as of [object Ob"'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked every visible chart and table for a descriptive title or label.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked visible percentages and rates for an explicit basis. The 48-hour-response chart says
    "By week opened; unanswered issues count as misses," and the epic table says "% of sub-issues closed."
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-08
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked chart titles, axis labels, legends, and plotted measures for unit or measure mismatches.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-09
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked headline figures against related charts and tables, including the 28-day opened/closed
    figures and net change.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: '“Open issues by assignee” card: the chart occupies only the left portion of a full-width
    card, leaving a large unused region to its right.'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked card edges, row bottoms, and inter-card spacing across the KPI, chart, and table sections.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked whether detailed tables, filters, or minor visuals appear before or dominate the headline
    metrics and primary charts.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked whether borders, fills, shadows, headers, icons, or other decoration visually outweigh
    the displayed data.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked chart colors for unexplained, arbitrary, or misleading encodings.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked for placeholder text, debug output, test elements, or other unfinished scaffolding.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Page title, section headings, subtitles, and charts for a stated outcome supported by chart
    values.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “OPEN ISSUES 511” with “+52 in 28 days” | “OPENED / CLOSED (28D) 123 / 71”
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Charts for annotated events, target lines, or a deliberately highlighted focal mark/series.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Chart color treatment for neutral context data with a single accent reserved for the focal
    subject.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Multi-series charts for direct series labels at line ends, on marks, or on slices rather than
    reliance on legends.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-08
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: '“Open engine:v2 issues in dbt-labs/dbt-core (epics excluded unless noted)” | “Open at the
    end of each week, by type” | “Complete weeks; when closed > opened the backlog shrank” | “By week
    opened; unanswered issues count as misses” | “Open issues: triageable status:triage” | “Issues with
    several areas count in each” | “(none) = adapter-agnostic” | “Top 15, excluding unassigned” | “Ranked
    by reactions, then comments”'
  round: 1