artifact_id: prefab
rubric_version: 2.8.0
formula: baseline
judges:
- openai:gpt-5.6-terra
rows:
- criterion_id: DEL-01
  category: delivery
  checker: program
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 10
  points_earned: 10.0
  evidence: ''
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: DEL-02
  category: delivery
  checker: program
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -4.0
  evidence: 2 console errors
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: DEL-03
  category: delivery
  checker: program
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: ''
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: COR-01
  category: correctness
  checker: program
  verdict: na
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: the brief has no reference numbers
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: BRF-01
  category: answers_brief
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: 'Checked all six brief questions against the visible dashboard: standing metrics; backlog
    trend and weekly opened/closed; triage age/status, 48-hour response trend, and oldest-first queue;
    work by area and adapter; epic completion; requested issues and assignee workload.'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: BRF-02
  category: answers_brief
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Compared the page space used by requested dashboard elements with visible non-brief elements
    such as titles, subtitles, legends, filters, and pagination.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-01
  category: working
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed the full page and all visible dashboard panels for crashes, error states, spinners,
    failed-load messages, and broadly empty content.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-02
  category: working
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked every visible KPI card, chart, and table for blank, loading, error, or placeholder
    states.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-01
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed the visible area and bar charts, including “Open issues over time,” “Opened vs closed
    per week,” and the horizontal stacked-bar charts, for non-zero-truncated value axes.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-02
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Compared labels that express rates or percentages with their displayed values, including “Answered
    within 48h (28d)” and “Open epics by % of sub-issues closed.”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-03
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: 'Compared repeated type-category colors across charts: Feature, Bug, Task, and Other in the
    backlog, area, adapter, and assignee views.'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-04
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: na
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed visible charts for two independent value axes and unclear series-to-axis mappings.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-05
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Compared the side-by-side “Open issues by area” and “Open issues by adapter” charts, which
    both show open-issue counts, for materially different undisclosed scales.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-06
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed line charts for lines connecting unordered categories. The visible line charts use
    weekly/date sequences.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-01
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: All visible charts, including the backlog trends, weekly opened-versus-closed bars, triage-age
    bars, area/adapter/assignee rankings, and epic tables.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-02
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Whether two or more charts use a form that hides their primary comparison.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-03
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: 'Multi-series/category charts: “Open issues over time,” “Opened vs closed per week,” “Open
    issues by triage status and age,” “Open issues by area,” “Open issues by adapter,” and “Open issues
    by assignee.”'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-04
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Ordering of ranked category charts, especially “Open issues by area,” “Open issues by adapter,”
    and “Open issues by assignee.”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-05
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Whether any standalone metric is rendered as a gauge or one-bar chart rather than as a number.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-07
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Visible charts and tables for duplicate presentations of the same data in the same form.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-08
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -8.0
  evidence: “Opened vs closed per week” — the approximately 440 opened-issues spike around late May/early
    June compresses most other weekly opened and closed bars near the baseline, making their differences
    hard to read.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-06
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: 'Endpoints of the visible time series: “Open issues over time,” “Opened vs closed per week,”
    and “New issues answered within 48 hours,” including the displayed as-of date and the “Complete weeks”
    note.'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-01
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed chart titles, axes, legends, labels, and table text across the full-resolution tiles
    for text overlapping other text or chart marks.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-02
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked whether text overlap appears in three or more charts on the page.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-03
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed titles, labels, table columns, and cell text within each visible card for clipping,
    ellipses hiding words, or overflow outside cards.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-04
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed full-resolution chart ticks, legends, table headers, values, and supporting text
    for illegibly small or overly faint text.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-05
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed all charts for insufficient card space that would make bars, lines, or table-like
    marks indistinguishable.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-01
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked headline tiles, chart axes/subtitles, and table columns for missing units. Durations
    are labeled in days/hours, percentages use %, and counts are named by their titles or columns.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-02
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked chart titles, subtitles, legends, axes, and table headers for raw field names, codes,
    or placeholders.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-03
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked whether the dashboard states its subject and a reporting date or period.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-04
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked all headline tiles for a stated period either on the tile or page. The page states
    “Data as of 2026-10-14,” and period-based tiles state “(28d).”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-05
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked every visible chart and table for a descriptive title or label.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-07
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -3.0
  evidence: “Answered within 48h (28d) 11%” — the 28-day period is stated, but it does not explicitly
    say whether the percentage is of issues opened, issues answered, or another population.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-08
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked chart and table labels against their displayed values, axes, and legends for measure
    or unit mismatches.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-09
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked headline figures, charts, tables, dates, and stated relationships for direct contradictions.
    The opened/closed counts reconcile with the stated +52 change (123 − 71 = 52).
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-01
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked the page-level spacing between cards and sections, excluding blank plot area inside
    charts and the space below the final card.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-02
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked alignment of card edges, row bottoms, and gaps across the KPI row, paired chart rows,
    and full-width tables.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-04
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked whether detailed tables, filters, or minor charts are placed ahead of or visually
    outweigh the headline KPIs and primary trend charts.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-05
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked whether card borders, fills, shadows, icons, or other decorative treatments outweigh
    the displayed data.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-06
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked chart color usage and legends across issue type, opened/closed, triage age, and assignee
    charts.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-07
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked visible titles, labels, tables, and controls for placeholder text, debug output, starter
    content, or stray test elements.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-01
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 10
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Page-level title and narrative findings; supporting charts
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-03
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 3
  points_earned: 3.0
  evidence: “Open issues 511” — “+52 in 28 days”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-04
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 6
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Charts for annotations, targets, or selectively highlighted data marks
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-06
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 5
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Chart color treatment across the dashboard
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-07
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 4
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Multi-series charts and their labeling
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-08
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 5
  points_earned: 5.0
  evidence: “Open engine:v2 issues in dbt-labs/dbt-core (epics excluded unless noted)” | “Open at the
    end of each week, by type” | “Complete weeks; when closed > opened the backlog shrank” | “By week
    opened; unanswered issues count as misses” | “Open issues still labeled status:triage” | “Issues with
    several areas count in each” | “(none) = adapter-agnostic” | “Ranked by reactions, then comments”
    | “Top 15, excluding unassigned”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
score: 0.547
category_scores:
  delivery: 0.6
  excellence: 0.242
agreement: 1.0
judge_errors: []
votes:
- criterion_id: BRF-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: 'Checked all six brief questions against the visible dashboard: standing metrics; backlog
    trend and weekly opened/closed; triage age/status, 48-hour response trend, and oldest-first queue;
    work by area and adapter; epic completion; requested issues and assignee workload.'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: BRF-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Compared the page space used by requested dashboard elements with visible non-brief elements
    such as titles, subtitles, legends, filters, and pagination.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed the full page and all visible dashboard panels for crashes, error states, spinners,
    failed-load messages, and broadly empty content.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked every visible KPI card, chart, and table for blank, loading, error, or placeholder
    states.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed the visible area and bar charts, including “Open issues over time,” “Opened vs closed
    per week,” and the horizontal stacked-bar charts, for non-zero-truncated value axes.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Compared labels that express rates or percentages with their displayed values, including “Answered
    within 48h (28d)” and “Open epics by % of sub-issues closed.”
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: 'Compared repeated type-category colors across charts: Feature, Bug, Task, and Other in the
    backlog, area, adapter, and assignee views.'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: na
  evidence: Reviewed visible charts for two independent value axes and unclear series-to-axis mappings.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Compared the side-by-side “Open issues by area” and “Open issues by adapter” charts, which
    both show open-issue counts, for materially different undisclosed scales.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed line charts for lines connecting unordered categories. The visible line charts use
    weekly/date sequences.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: All visible charts, including the backlog trends, weekly opened-versus-closed bars, triage-age
    bars, area/adapter/assignee rankings, and epic tables.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Whether two or more charts use a form that hides their primary comparison.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: 'Multi-series/category charts: “Open issues over time,” “Opened vs closed per week,” “Open
    issues by triage status and age,” “Open issues by area,” “Open issues by adapter,” and “Open issues
    by assignee.”'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Ordering of ranked category charts, especially “Open issues by area,” “Open issues by adapter,”
    and “Open issues by assignee.”
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Whether any standalone metric is rendered as a gauge or one-bar chart rather than as a number.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Visible charts and tables for duplicate presentations of the same data in the same form.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-08
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “Opened vs closed per week” — the approximately 440 opened-issues spike around late May/early
    June compresses most other weekly opened and closed bars near the baseline, making their differences
    hard to read.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: 'Endpoints of the visible time series: “Open issues over time,” “Opened vs closed per week,”
    and “New issues answered within 48 hours,” including the displayed as-of date and the “Complete weeks”
    note.'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed chart titles, axes, legends, labels, and table text across the full-resolution tiles
    for text overlapping other text or chart marks.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked whether text overlap appears in three or more charts on the page.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed titles, labels, table columns, and cell text within each visible card for clipping,
    ellipses hiding words, or overflow outside cards.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed full-resolution chart ticks, legends, table headers, values, and supporting text
    for illegibly small or overly faint text.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed all charts for insufficient card space that would make bars, lines, or table-like
    marks indistinguishable.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked headline tiles, chart axes/subtitles, and table columns for missing units. Durations
    are labeled in days/hours, percentages use %, and counts are named by their titles or columns.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked chart titles, subtitles, legends, axes, and table headers for raw field names, codes,
    or placeholders.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked whether the dashboard states its subject and a reporting date or period.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked all headline tiles for a stated period either on the tile or page. The page states
    “Data as of 2026-10-14,” and period-based tiles state “(28d).”
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked every visible chart and table for a descriptive title or label.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “Answered within 48h (28d) 11%” — the 28-day period is stated, but it does not explicitly
    say whether the percentage is of issues opened, issues answered, or another population.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-08
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked chart and table labels against their displayed values, axes, and legends for measure
    or unit mismatches.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-09
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked headline figures, charts, tables, dates, and stated relationships for direct contradictions.
    The opened/closed counts reconcile with the stated +52 change (123 − 71 = 52).
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked the page-level spacing between cards and sections, excluding blank plot area inside
    charts and the space below the final card.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked alignment of card edges, row bottoms, and gaps across the KPI row, paired chart rows,
    and full-width tables.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked whether detailed tables, filters, or minor charts are placed ahead of or visually
    outweigh the headline KPIs and primary trend charts.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked whether card borders, fills, shadows, icons, or other decorative treatments outweigh
    the displayed data.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked chart color usage and legends across issue type, opened/closed, triage age, and assignee
    charts.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked visible titles, labels, tables, and controls for placeholder text, debug output, starter
    content, or stray test elements.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Page-level title and narrative findings; supporting charts
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “Open issues 511” — “+52 in 28 days”
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Charts for annotations, targets, or selectively highlighted data marks
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Chart color treatment across the dashboard
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Multi-series charts and their labeling
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-08
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “Open engine:v2 issues in dbt-labs/dbt-core (epics excluded unless noted)” | “Open at the
    end of each week, by type” | “Complete weeks; when closed > opened the backlog shrank” | “By week
    opened; unanswered issues count as misses” | “Open issues still labeled status:triage” | “Issues with
    several areas count in each” | “(none) = adapter-agnostic” | “Ranked by reactions, then comments”
    | “Top 15, excluding unassigned”
  round: 1