artifact_id: prefab-windows-2000
rubric_version: 2.8.0
formula: baseline
judges:
- openai:gpt-5.6-terra
rows:
- criterion_id: DEL-01
  category: delivery
  checker: program
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 10
  points_earned: 10.0
  evidence: ''
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: DEL-02
  category: delivery
  checker: program
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -4.0
  evidence: 2 console errors
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: DEL-03
  category: delivery
  checker: program
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: ''
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: COR-01
  category: correctness
  checker: program
  verdict: na
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: the brief has no reference numbers
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: BRF-01
  category: answers_brief
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: 'Reviewed all six brief questions against the visible dashboard sections: “Where do things
    stand?”, “Is the backlog shrinking?”, “Are we keeping up with triage?”, “Where is the work?”, “How
    close are the epics?”, and “What should we work on, and who is on it?”.'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: BRF-02
  category: answers_brief
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Compared the visible requested content (KPIs, backlog charts, triage views and queue, area/adapter
    charts, epic-progress table, requested-issues table, and assignee chart) with non-brief content such
    as the application-style title/menu/status bars.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-01
  category: working
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed the full dashboard for a page-level error state, shell-only layout, loading state,
    or widespread empty panels.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-02
  category: working
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed the visible KPI cards, charts, and tables for blank states, errors, spinners, or
    placeholders instead of data.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-01
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked the visible area chart and horizontal bar charts for truncated value axes or bar lengths
    suggesting a nonzero baseline.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-02
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Compared rate/share/% labels with the displayed values and chart measures, including the 48-hour
    response KPI and related weekly chart.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-03
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Compared repeated color-coded categories across charts, especially Feature, Bug, Task, and
    Other.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-04
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: na
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed charts for two independent value axes without clear series-to-axis mapping.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-05
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed side-by-side charts for the same measure, including Open Issues by Area and Open
    Issues by Adapter, for visibly inconsistent scales.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-06
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed line charts to determine whether lines connect unordered categories rather than ordered
    sequences.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-01
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed the chart forms used for trends, weekly comparison, ranked categories, triage ages,
    and assignees.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-02
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked whether two or more charts use a form that obscures their primary comparison.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-03
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed multi-series charts and legends, including issue type, opened/closed, triage-age,
    area, adapter, and assignee charts.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-04
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: 'Checked ordering in ranked categorical comparisons: area, adapter, epics, requested issues,
    and assignees.'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-05
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked whether a single KPI is rendered as a gauge or an otherwise unnecessary one-value
    chart.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-07
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Compared the charts and tables for duplicated datasets presented in the same chart form.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-08
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -8.0
  evidence: “OPENED VS CLOSED PER WEEK” — the very large opened spike (roughly 440) compresses the ordinary
    weekly opened/closed bars near the baseline, making most week-to-week comparisons difficult to read
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-06
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked the first and last points of the visible time series against the as-of date (2026-10-14)
    and visible notes.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-01
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed chart titles, axis ticks, legends, bar labels, and table headers across the full-resolution
    tiles for text collisions.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-02
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed all charts for overlapping text and counted charts with any such collision.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-03
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed visible titles, labels, legends, table headers, and table values within their cards
    for clipping, truncation, ellipses, or overflow.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-04
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed the full-resolution tiles for illegibly small or excessively faint text, including
    chart ticks, legends, subtitles, and table text.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-05
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed the drawn sizes of the line, bar, stacked-bar, and time-series charts to determine
    whether marks could be distinguished.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-01
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked headline metrics, chart axes, subtitles, legends, and table columns for units. Percent
    is shown as “11%”; duration metrics say “MEDIAN DAYS TO CLOSE (28D),” “median age 141 days,” and table
    headers use “Age (d)” / “Idle (d).”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-02
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked chart titles, legends, axes, and table headers. Labels use reader-facing terms such
    as “Feature,” “Bug,” “Task,” “Age (d),” and “CUSTOMER”; no raw field name, code field, or placeholder
    is visible in those label locations.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-03
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked the page heading, subtitle, charts, and footer for scope and date coverage.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-04
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked each headline tile for its period or page-level date. The dated metrics state “(28D),”
    current-state metrics are framed by the page’s “Data as of 2026-10-14,” and the awaiting-triage tile
    identifies its median age.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-05
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked all visible charts and tables. Each has a descriptive title or label, including “OPEN
    ISSUES OVER TIME,” “TRIAGE QUEUE — OLDEST FIRST,” “OPEN ISSUES BY AREA,” and “OPEN ISSUES BY ASSIGNEE.”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-07
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -3.0
  evidence: “ANSWERED WITHIN 48H (28D)” — “11%”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-08
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked chart titles and subtitles against the plotted marks, including issue counts, issue
    types, week dates, age bands, and completion percentages. No visible label conflicts with the displayed
    measure.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-09
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked headline values against related charts/tables and compared visible dates. The page
    consistently states “Data as of 2026-10-14” / “As of 2026-10-14”; no direct numerical or textual contradiction
    is visible.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-01
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Space between and around dashboard cards across the full page.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-02
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Alignment of card edges, row heights, and inter-card gaps.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-04
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Visual order and relative space of summaries, charts, and detail tables.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-05
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -4.0
  evidence: Saturated blue page background and heavy gray rounded card fills/borders visually dominate
    the charts and tables
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-06
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Color use in charts and legends.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-07
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Visible page content for placeholder, debug, or stray test material.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-01
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 10
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Page title/subtitles and backlog charts for a stated outcome or finding supported by chart
    values.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-03
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 3
  points_earned: 3.0
  evidence: “OPEN ISSUES 511” with “+52 in 28 days”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-04
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 6
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Charts for an annotated spike/dip, target line, or a specially highlighted focal mark.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-06
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 5
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Whether neutral-gray data with a single reserved accent color is used to emphasize the dashboard
    subject.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-07
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 4
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Multi-series charts for labels placed directly on series or slices rather than requiring a
    legend.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-08
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 5
  points_earned: 5.0
  evidence: “Open engine:v2 issues in dbt-labs/dbt-core (epics excluded unless noted)” | “Open at the
    end of each week, by type” | “Complete weeks; when closed > opened the backlog shrank” | “By week
    opened; unanswered issues count as misses” | “Open issues still labeled status:triage” | “Issues with
    several areas count in each” | “(none) = adapter-agnostic” | “Top of the list can be closed out soon”
    | “Ranked by reactions, then comments” | “Top 15, excluding unassigned”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
score: 0.507
category_scores:
  delivery: 0.6
  excellence: 0.242
agreement: 1.0
judge_errors: []
votes:
- criterion_id: BRF-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: 'Reviewed all six brief questions against the visible dashboard sections: “Where do things
    stand?”, “Is the backlog shrinking?”, “Are we keeping up with triage?”, “Where is the work?”, “How
    close are the epics?”, and “What should we work on, and who is on it?”.'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: BRF-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Compared the visible requested content (KPIs, backlog charts, triage views and queue, area/adapter
    charts, epic-progress table, requested-issues table, and assignee chart) with non-brief content such
    as the application-style title/menu/status bars.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed the full dashboard for a page-level error state, shell-only layout, loading state,
    or widespread empty panels.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed the visible KPI cards, charts, and tables for blank states, errors, spinners, or
    placeholders instead of data.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked the visible area chart and horizontal bar charts for truncated value axes or bar lengths
    suggesting a nonzero baseline.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Compared rate/share/% labels with the displayed values and chart measures, including the 48-hour
    response KPI and related weekly chart.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Compared repeated color-coded categories across charts, especially Feature, Bug, Task, and
    Other.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: na
  evidence: Reviewed charts for two independent value axes without clear series-to-axis mapping.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed side-by-side charts for the same measure, including Open Issues by Area and Open
    Issues by Adapter, for visibly inconsistent scales.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed line charts to determine whether lines connect unordered categories rather than ordered
    sequences.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed the chart forms used for trends, weekly comparison, ranked categories, triage ages,
    and assignees.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked whether two or more charts use a form that obscures their primary comparison.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed multi-series charts and legends, including issue type, opened/closed, triage-age,
    area, adapter, and assignee charts.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: 'Checked ordering in ranked categorical comparisons: area, adapter, epics, requested issues,
    and assignees.'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked whether a single KPI is rendered as a gauge or an otherwise unnecessary one-value
    chart.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Compared the charts and tables for duplicated datasets presented in the same chart form.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-08
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “OPENED VS CLOSED PER WEEK” — the very large opened spike (roughly 440) compresses the ordinary
    weekly opened/closed bars near the baseline, making most week-to-week comparisons difficult to read
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked the first and last points of the visible time series against the as-of date (2026-10-14)
    and visible notes.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed chart titles, axis ticks, legends, bar labels, and table headers across the full-resolution
    tiles for text collisions.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed all charts for overlapping text and counted charts with any such collision.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed visible titles, labels, legends, table headers, and table values within their cards
    for clipping, truncation, ellipses, or overflow.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed the full-resolution tiles for illegibly small or excessively faint text, including
    chart ticks, legends, subtitles, and table text.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed the drawn sizes of the line, bar, stacked-bar, and time-series charts to determine
    whether marks could be distinguished.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked headline metrics, chart axes, subtitles, legends, and table columns for units. Percent
    is shown as “11%”; duration metrics say “MEDIAN DAYS TO CLOSE (28D),” “median age 141 days,” and table
    headers use “Age (d)” / “Idle (d).”
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked chart titles, legends, axes, and table headers. Labels use reader-facing terms such
    as “Feature,” “Bug,” “Task,” “Age (d),” and “CUSTOMER”; no raw field name, code field, or placeholder
    is visible in those label locations.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked the page heading, subtitle, charts, and footer for scope and date coverage.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked each headline tile for its period or page-level date. The dated metrics state “(28D),”
    current-state metrics are framed by the page’s “Data as of 2026-10-14,” and the awaiting-triage tile
    identifies its median age.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked all visible charts and tables. Each has a descriptive title or label, including “OPEN
    ISSUES OVER TIME,” “TRIAGE QUEUE — OLDEST FIRST,” “OPEN ISSUES BY AREA,” and “OPEN ISSUES BY ASSIGNEE.”
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “ANSWERED WITHIN 48H (28D)” — “11%”
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-08
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked chart titles and subtitles against the plotted marks, including issue counts, issue
    types, week dates, age bands, and completion percentages. No visible label conflicts with the displayed
    measure.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-09
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked headline values against related charts/tables and compared visible dates. The page
    consistently states “Data as of 2026-10-14” / “As of 2026-10-14”; no direct numerical or textual contradiction
    is visible.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Space between and around dashboard cards across the full page.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Alignment of card edges, row heights, and inter-card gaps.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Visual order and relative space of summaries, charts, and detail tables.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: Saturated blue page background and heavy gray rounded card fills/borders visually dominate
    the charts and tables
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Color use in charts and legends.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Visible page content for placeholder, debug, or stray test material.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Page title/subtitles and backlog charts for a stated outcome or finding supported by chart
    values.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “OPEN ISSUES 511” with “+52 in 28 days”
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Charts for an annotated spike/dip, target line, or a specially highlighted focal mark.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Whether neutral-gray data with a single reserved accent color is used to emphasize the dashboard
    subject.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Multi-series charts for labels placed directly on series or slices rather than requiring a
    legend.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-08
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “Open engine:v2 issues in dbt-labs/dbt-core (epics excluded unless noted)” | “Open at the
    end of each week, by type” | “Complete weeks; when closed > opened the backlog shrank” | “By week
    opened; unanswered issues count as misses” | “Open issues still labeled status:triage” | “Issues with
    several areas count in each” | “(none) = adapter-agnostic” | “Top of the list can be closed out soon”
    | “Ranked by reactions, then comments” | “Top 15, excluding unassigned”
  round: 1