artifact_id: mosaic
rubric_version: 2.8.0
formula: baseline
judges:
- openai:gpt-5.6-terra
rows:
- criterion_id: DEL-01
  category: delivery
  checker: program
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 10
  points_earned: 10.0
  evidence: ''
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: DEL-02
  category: delivery
  checker: program
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -4.0
  evidence: 10 console errors
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: DEL-03
  category: delivery
  checker: program
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: ''
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: COR-01
  category: correctness
  checker: program
  verdict: na
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: the brief has no reference numbers
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: BRF-01
  category: answers_brief
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -15.0
  evidence: “Is the backlog shrinking? Show open issues over time and opened versus closed issues by complete
    week.” | “Where is the work? Show open issues by area and adapter.”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: BRF-02
  category: answers_brief
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Compared visible page space used by requested brief content (KPIs, requested chart/table sections,
    triage queue, epic progress, and requested-issues table) with content not requested in the brief.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-01
  category: working
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked whether the page is an overall error/crash state or whether most dashboard panels
    lack data. The KPI cards and several tables contain data, despite multiple blank chart panels.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-02
  category: working
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -15.0
  evidence: “Open issues over time” — header/subtitle only; no chart data | “Opened vs closed per week”
    — header/subtitle only; no chart data | “Open issues by triage status and age” — header/subtitle only;
    no chart data | “New issues answered within 48 hours” — header/subtitle only; no chart data | “Open
    issues by area” — header/subtitle only; no chart data | “Open issues by adapter” — header/subtitle
    only; no chart data | “Open issues by assignee” — header/subtitle only; no chart data
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-01
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked visible amount-encoding bars. The epic-completion horizontal bars have percentage
    labels and their displayed lengths appear consistent with those percentages; no truncated value axis
    is visible.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-02
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked rate/share/percent wording against displayed values. “Answered within 48h (28d)” is
    shown as 11%, and epic “% complete” values are displayed as percentages.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-03
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: na
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked whether a color-distinguished category recurs in more than one chart with conflicting
    colors. No repeated color-coded categories are visible.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-04
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: na
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked visible charts for two independent value axes without series-to-axis mapping. No visible
    chart has two value axes.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-05
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: na
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked side-by-side or small-multiple charts of the same measure for undisclosed scale differences.
    The relevant chart panels are blank, so no differing peer scales are visible.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-06
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked visible visualizations for lines connecting unordered categories. No visible line
    chart connects unordered categories.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-01
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: cannot_determine
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Visible chart forms and their intended comparisons, including the tiles titled “Open issues
    over time,” “Opened vs closed per week,” “Open issues by area,” and “Open issues by adapter.”
  agreement: null
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-02
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: cannot_determine
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Whether two or more visible charts use forms that obscure their primary comparisons.
  agreement: null
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-03
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: na
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Rendered multi-series or multi-category charts, including legends and colored series/category
    distinctions.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-04
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: 'Ranked comparisons visible in the tables: “Open epics by % of sub-issues closed” is ordered
    from 100% down to 63%, and “Most-requested open issues” is labeled “Ranked by reactions, then comments”
    and descends by reactions.'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-05
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Whether a single value is drawn as a gauge or one-bar chart rather than shown directly.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-07
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Visible charts and tables for repeated data shown in the same form.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-08
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: cannot_determine
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Visible chart scales and ordering for unreadable comparisons or improperly ordered time bins.
  agreement: null
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-06
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: na
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Rendered time-series endpoints for unexplained incomplete-period spikes or drops.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-01
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked all visible KPI cards, chart cards, and tables for text colliding with other text
    or with chart marks.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-02
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked whether three or more visible charts contain overlapping text.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-03
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -4.0
  evidence: '"[v2 Bug] dbt-fusion: HTTP client breaks behind corporate SSL inspection proxies and lineage"
    — the final visible row in “Most-requested open issues” is cut off at the bottom of its card'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-04
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked the full-resolution tiles for illegibly small or overly faint text, including supporting
    labels and table values.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-05
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: cannot_determine
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked visible chart cards for bars, lines, or cells that are too compressed to distinguish.
  agreement: null
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-01
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked headline tiles, table columns, and visible percentage/progress values for missing
    units or bases nearby.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-02
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked visible chart/table titles, headers, and legends for raw field names, code, or placeholders.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-03
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked the page header and metric labels for scope and period information.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-04
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -4.0
  evidence: '"OPEN ISSUES 511" — no snapshot/as-of date; header says "Data as of [object Ob" | "AWAITING
    TRIAGE 345" — no snapshot/as-of date | "CUSTOMER-REPORTED OPEN 18" — no snapshot/as-of date'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-05
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked all visible cards, tables, and chart placeholders for a title or descriptive label.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-07
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -3.0
  evidence: '"ANSWERED WITHIN 48H (28D) 11%" — the 28-day window is stated, but the denominator/base for
    the percentage is not stated'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-08
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked labels against the visible values, table columns, and progress bars for incompatible
    measures or stated contradictions.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-09
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -10.0
  evidence: '"Click a type in the legend to filter the stacked charts on this page; brush the backlog
    chart to zoom the weekly charts." — the referenced charts and legend are not visibly rendered | "Open
    issues over time" and "Opened vs closed per week" are titled chart cards with no visible plotted content
    | "Open issues by area", "Open issues by adapter", and "Open issues by assignee" are titled cards
    with no visible plotted content'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-01
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Space between and around page cards; excluding blank plot areas inside chart cards and blank
    space below the last card.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-02
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Alignment of card edges, row bottoms, and inter-card gaps across the visible dashboard.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-04
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -5.0
  evidence: “Triage queue — oldest first” raw-detail table is given substantially more vertical space
    than the summary KPI cards and the chart cards
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-05
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Relative visual weight of cards, borders, fills, headers, shadows, icons, and data.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-06
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Whether visible color encodes a meaningful variable and whether legends/encodings are misleading.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-07
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -4.0
  evidence: “Data as of [object Ob”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-01
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 10
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Page title, section headings, headline cards, and visible chart/table captions for a written
    conclusion about what happened.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-03
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 3
  points_earned: 3.0
  evidence: “OPEN ISSUES 511” — “+52 in 28 days”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-04
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 6
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Visible charts and progress displays for an annotated event, target/reference line, or deliberately
    highlighted series/bar.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-06
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 5
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Visible tables, cards, and epic completion bars for a neutral-data treatment with a single
    accent reserved for the dashboard’s subject.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-07
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: na
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Visible charts for multiple series or pie slices with direct labels.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-08
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 5
  points_earned: 5.0
  evidence: “Open at the end of each week, by type” | “Complete weeks; when closed > opened the backlog
    shrank” | “By week opened; unanswered issues count as misses” | “Open issues still labeled status:triage”
    | “Issues with several areas count in each” | “(none) = adapter-agnostic” | “Top of the list can be
    closed out soon” | “Ranked by reactions, then comments” | “Top 15, excluding unassigned”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
score: 0.057
category_scores:
  delivery: 0.6
  excellence: 0.276
agreement: 1.0
judge_errors: []
votes:
- criterion_id: BRF-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “Is the backlog shrinking? Show open issues over time and opened versus closed issues by complete
    week.” | “Where is the work? Show open issues by area and adapter.”
  round: 1
- criterion_id: BRF-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Compared visible page space used by requested brief content (KPIs, requested chart/table sections,
    triage queue, epic progress, and requested-issues table) with content not requested in the brief.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked whether the page is an overall error/crash state or whether most dashboard panels
    lack data. The KPI cards and several tables contain data, despite multiple blank chart panels.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “Open issues over time” — header/subtitle only; no chart data | “Opened vs closed per week”
    — header/subtitle only; no chart data | “Open issues by triage status and age” — header/subtitle only;
    no chart data | “New issues answered within 48 hours” — header/subtitle only; no chart data | “Open
    issues by area” — header/subtitle only; no chart data | “Open issues by adapter” — header/subtitle
    only; no chart data | “Open issues by assignee” — header/subtitle only; no chart data
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked visible amount-encoding bars. The epic-completion horizontal bars have percentage
    labels and their displayed lengths appear consistent with those percentages; no truncated value axis
    is visible.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked rate/share/percent wording against displayed values. “Answered within 48h (28d)” is
    shown as 11%, and epic “% complete” values are displayed as percentages.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: na
  evidence: Checked whether a color-distinguished category recurs in more than one chart with conflicting
    colors. No repeated color-coded categories are visible.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: na
  evidence: Checked visible charts for two independent value axes without series-to-axis mapping. No visible
    chart has two value axes.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: na
  evidence: Checked side-by-side or small-multiple charts of the same measure for undisclosed scale differences.
    The relevant chart panels are blank, so no differing peer scales are visible.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked visible visualizations for lines connecting unordered categories. No visible line
    chart connects unordered categories.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: cannot_determine
  evidence: Visible chart forms and their intended comparisons, including the tiles titled “Open issues
    over time,” “Opened vs closed per week,” “Open issues by area,” and “Open issues by adapter.”
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: cannot_determine
  evidence: Whether two or more visible charts use forms that obscure their primary comparisons.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: na
  evidence: Rendered multi-series or multi-category charts, including legends and colored series/category
    distinctions.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: 'Ranked comparisons visible in the tables: “Open epics by % of sub-issues closed” is ordered
    from 100% down to 63%, and “Most-requested open issues” is labeled “Ranked by reactions, then comments”
    and descends by reactions.'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Whether a single value is drawn as a gauge or one-bar chart rather than shown directly.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Visible charts and tables for repeated data shown in the same form.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-08
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: cannot_determine
  evidence: Visible chart scales and ordering for unreadable comparisons or improperly ordered time bins.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: na
  evidence: Rendered time-series endpoints for unexplained incomplete-period spikes or drops.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked all visible KPI cards, chart cards, and tables for text colliding with other text
    or with chart marks.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked whether three or more visible charts contain overlapping text.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: '"[v2 Bug] dbt-fusion: HTTP client breaks behind corporate SSL inspection proxies and lineage"
    — the final visible row in “Most-requested open issues” is cut off at the bottom of its card'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked the full-resolution tiles for illegibly small or overly faint text, including supporting
    labels and table values.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: cannot_determine
  evidence: Checked visible chart cards for bars, lines, or cells that are too compressed to distinguish.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked headline tiles, table columns, and visible percentage/progress values for missing
    units or bases nearby.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked visible chart/table titles, headers, and legends for raw field names, code, or placeholders.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked the page header and metric labels for scope and period information.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: '"OPEN ISSUES 511" — no snapshot/as-of date; header says "Data as of [object Ob" | "AWAITING
    TRIAGE 345" — no snapshot/as-of date | "CUSTOMER-REPORTED OPEN 18" — no snapshot/as-of date'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked all visible cards, tables, and chart placeholders for a title or descriptive label.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: '"ANSWERED WITHIN 48H (28D) 11%" — the 28-day window is stated, but the denominator/base for
    the percentage is not stated'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-08
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked labels against the visible values, table columns, and progress bars for incompatible
    measures or stated contradictions.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-09
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: '"Click a type in the legend to filter the stacked charts on this page; brush the backlog
    chart to zoom the weekly charts." — the referenced charts and legend are not visibly rendered | "Open
    issues over time" and "Opened vs closed per week" are titled chart cards with no visible plotted content
    | "Open issues by area", "Open issues by adapter", and "Open issues by assignee" are titled cards
    with no visible plotted content'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Space between and around page cards; excluding blank plot areas inside chart cards and blank
    space below the last card.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Alignment of card edges, row bottoms, and inter-card gaps across the visible dashboard.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “Triage queue — oldest first” raw-detail table is given substantially more vertical space
    than the summary KPI cards and the chart cards
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Relative visual weight of cards, borders, fills, headers, shadows, icons, and data.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Whether visible color encodes a meaningful variable and whether legends/encodings are misleading.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “Data as of [object Ob”
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Page title, section headings, headline cards, and visible chart/table captions for a written
    conclusion about what happened.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “OPEN ISSUES 511” — “+52 in 28 days”
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Visible charts and progress displays for an annotated event, target/reference line, or deliberately
    highlighted series/bar.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Visible tables, cards, and epic completion bars for a neutral-data treatment with a single
    accent reserved for the dashboard’s subject.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: na
  evidence: Visible charts for multiple series or pie slices with direct labels.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-08
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “Open at the end of each week, by type” | “Complete weeks; when closed > opened the backlog
    shrank” | “By week opened; unanswered issues count as misses” | “Open issues still labeled status:triage”
    | “Issues with several areas count in each” | “(none) = adapter-agnostic” | “Top of the list can be
    closed out soon” | “Ranked by reactions, then comments” | “Top 15, excluding unassigned”
  round: 1