artifact_id: marimo
rubric_version: 2.8.0
formula: baseline
judges:
- openai:gpt-5.6-terra
rows:
- criterion_id: DEL-01
  category: delivery
  checker: program
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 10
  points_earned: 10.0
  evidence: ''
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: DEL-02
  category: delivery
  checker: program
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: 0 console errors
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: DEL-03
  category: delivery
  checker: program
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: ''
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: COR-01
  category: correctness
  checker: program
  verdict: na
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: the brief has no reference numbers
  agreement: null
  votes: 0
- criterion_id: BRF-01
  category: answers_brief
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: 'Checked all six brief questions against visible dashboard elements: 1) summary metric cards;
    2) “Open issues over time” and “Opened vs closed per week”; 3) “Open issues by triage status and age,”
    “New issues answered within 48 hours,” and “Triage queue — oldest first”; 4) “Open issues by area”
    and “Open issues by adapter”; 5) “Open epics by % of sub-issues closed”; 6) “Most-requested open issues”
    and “Open issues by assignee.”'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: BRF-02
  category: answers_brief
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Compared visible dashboard content with the requested content. The page is predominantly occupied
    by the requested metrics, charts, and tables; section headings, legends, subtitles, and the as-of
    line are supporting context rather than substantial additional content.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-01
  category: working
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed the full page and all visible dashboard sections for crash/error states, empty-shell
    behavior, failed-load messages, or widespread missing data.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-02
  category: working
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Reviewed every visible chart and table panel for blank states, error text, loading spinners,
    or placeholders in place of data.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-01
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: 'Checked the visible amount-encoding area and bar charts: open issues over time, opened vs.
    closed per week, triage-status/age bars, area bars, adapter bars, and assignee bars.'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-02
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Compared rate/share/% wording with plotted values, including the “Answered within 48h” card
    and “New issues answered within 48 hours” percentage line chart.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-03
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Compared repeated type-category colors across charts, including Feature, Bug, Task, and Other
    in the backlog, area, adapter, and assignee charts.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-04
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: na
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked visible charts for independent dual value axes and series-to-axis ambiguity.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-05
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: na
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked for side-by-side or small-multiple peer charts showing the same measure on undisclosed
    different scales.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: HON-06
  category: honesty
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked line charts for connections across unordered categories; the visible line chart is
    ordered by week opened.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-01
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: All visible charts, including time series, ranked bars, stacked bars, and tables.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-02
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Whether two or more charts use comparison-hiding forms such as pies/donuts, 3D charts, trend
    tables/pies, or ranking lines.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-03
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: 'Multi-series/category charts: issue type stacks, triage-age stacks, and area/adapter/assignee
    charts.'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-04
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Ranked category charts, especially open issues by area, adapter, and assignee.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-05
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Whether any single metric is rendered as a gauge or one-bar chart rather than a number.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-07
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Whether any two charts repeat the same data in the same visual form.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-08
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -8.0
  evidence: “Opened vs closed per week” — the roughly 440 opened-issues spike around late May compresses
    the usual weekly bars (generally tens of issues), making normal opened-versus-closed comparisons difficult
    to read.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-06
  category: form
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: 'All visible time series: “Open issues over time,” “Opened vs closed per week,” and “New issues
    answered within 48 hours,” including their first and last periods against the 2026-10-14 as-of date.'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-01
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked all chart titles, legends, axes, tick labels, and plotted labels in the full-resolution
    tiles.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-02
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked whether overlapping text appears in three or more charts.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-03
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -4.0
  evidence: 'Triage queue — oldest first table: "[FEAT] [VSCE] Prefer parent errors over downs..." | Triage
    queue — oldest first table: "[FEAT] [VSCE] double-clicking a model from a..." | Triage queue — oldest
    first table: "[FEAT] Add ability to output `show` results as ..." | Triage queue — oldest first table:
    "[FEAT] Report on adapter.execute calls at pars..." | Triage queue — oldest first table: "[FEAT] Support
    All Purpose Compute Clusters ..." | Most-requested open issues table: "Expose a Python API with Rust
    bindings, enab..." | Most-requested open issues table: "[v2 Bug] BigQuery: nested column description..."
    | Most-requested open issues table: "[FEAT] Highlight the current model in the line..." | Open epics
    by % of sub-issues closed table: "[EPIC] BigQuery Structured and Semi-Structur..." | Open epics by
    % of sub-issues closed table: "[EPIC] [Databricks] Data Sketching Functions (..." | Open epics by
    % of sub-issues closed table: "[EPIC] [Databricks] Semi-structured & Variant ..." | Open epics by
    % of sub-issues closed table: "[EPIC] [Databricks] Conditional & Type Conver..." | Open epics by %
    of sub-issues closed table: "[EPIC] [Databricks] Array, Map & Window Func..." | Open epics by % of
    sub-issues closed table: "[EPIC] [SPAN] Incorrect or missing error/warni..."'
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-04
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked text at the full-resolution tile size, including supporting copy, ticks, legends,
    and table text.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-05
  category: legibility
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked the stacked-area, grouped-bar, stacked-bar, and line charts for indistinguishable
    marks caused by insufficient chart size.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-01
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked headline tiles, chart axes, legends, subtitles, and table columns for unlabeled currency,
    percentages, counts, or durations.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-02
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked titles, axes, legends, and table headers for raw field names, codes, or placeholders.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-03
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked whether the page states its subject and a reporting period/date.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-04
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked each headline tile for a period on the tile or elsewhere on the page; the page gives
    “Data as of 2026-10-14.”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-05
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked all visible charts and tables for descriptive titles or labels.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-07
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked visible rates and shares for their denominator/basis. The response chart states “By
    week opened; unanswered issues count as misses,” and the epic table shows Closed and Sub-issues alongside
    “% complete.”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-08
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Checked chart titles, axes, legends, and plotted measures for mismatches or contradictions.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-09
  category: labeling
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -10.0
  evidence: “Top 15, excluding unassigned” — the visible “Open issues by assignee” chart shows only eight
    assignee rows (serramattuu through ragesh-g) before the page ends.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-01
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -5.0
  evidence: The KPI-card section has a half-empty second row containing only “Customer-reported open,”
    leaving the rest of that row blank
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-02
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Alignment of KPI cards, charts, tables, and section edges
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-04
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Visual order and relative space given to summary versus detail
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-05
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Visual weight of card borders, fills, shadows, and other decoration
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-06
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Whether colors have explained, consistent data encodings
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-07
  category: layout
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 0
  points_earned: -4.0
  evidence: Unexplained vertical stack of small gray dash marks to the far right of the “Opened vs closed
    per week” chart
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-01
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 10
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Page title, section headings, and charts for a written conclusion supported by a chart.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-03
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 3
  points_earned: 3.0
  evidence: “Open issues 511” — “+52 in 28 days” | “Opened / closed (28d) 123 / 71”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-04
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 6
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Time-series and comparison charts for an annotation, target line, or a single visually highlighted
    subject.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-06
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 5
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Chart color treatment across the dashboard.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-07
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'no'
  points_possible: 4
  points_earned: 0.0
  evidence: Multi-series charts for direct labeling of series at line ends or on marks rather than reliance
    on a legend.
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-08
  category: excellence
  checker: judge
  verdict: 'yes'
  points_possible: 5
  points_earned: 5.0
  evidence: “Open engine:v2 issues in dbt-labs/dbt-core (epics excluded unless noted)” | “Complete weeks;
    when closed > opened the backlog shrank” | “By week opened; unanswered issues count as misses” | “Issues
    with several areas count in each” | “(none) = adapter-agnostic” | “Top 15, excluding unassigned”
  agreement: 1.0
  votes: 1
score: 0.387
category_scores:
  delivery: 1.0
  excellence: 0.242
agreement: 1.0
judge_errors: []
votes:
- criterion_id: BRF-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: 'Checked all six brief questions against visible dashboard elements: 1) summary metric cards;
    2) “Open issues over time” and “Opened vs closed per week”; 3) “Open issues by triage status and age,”
    “New issues answered within 48 hours,” and “Triage queue — oldest first”; 4) “Open issues by area”
    and “Open issues by adapter”; 5) “Open epics by % of sub-issues closed”; 6) “Most-requested open issues”
    and “Open issues by assignee.”'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: BRF-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Compared visible dashboard content with the requested content. The page is predominantly occupied
    by the requested metrics, charts, and tables; section headings, legends, subtitles, and the as-of
    line are supporting context rather than substantial additional content.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed the full page and all visible dashboard sections for crash/error states, empty-shell
    behavior, failed-load messages, or widespread missing data.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: WRK-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Reviewed every visible chart and table panel for blank states, error text, loading spinners,
    or placeholders in place of data.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: 'Checked the visible amount-encoding area and bar charts: open issues over time, opened vs.
    closed per week, triage-status/age bars, area bars, adapter bars, and assignee bars.'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Compared rate/share/% wording with plotted values, including the “Answered within 48h” card
    and “New issues answered within 48 hours” percentage line chart.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Compared repeated type-category colors across charts, including Feature, Bug, Task, and Other
    in the backlog, area, adapter, and assignee charts.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: na
  evidence: Checked visible charts for independent dual value axes and series-to-axis ambiguity.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: na
  evidence: Checked for side-by-side or small-multiple peer charts showing the same measure on undisclosed
    different scales.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: HON-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked line charts for connections across unordered categories; the visible line chart is
    ordered by week opened.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: All visible charts, including time series, ranked bars, stacked bars, and tables.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Whether two or more charts use comparison-hiding forms such as pies/donuts, 3D charts, trend
    tables/pies, or ranking lines.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: 'Multi-series/category charts: issue type stacks, triage-age stacks, and area/adapter/assignee
    charts.'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Ranked category charts, especially open issues by area, adapter, and assignee.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Whether any single metric is rendered as a gauge or one-bar chart rather than a number.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Whether any two charts repeat the same data in the same visual form.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-08
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “Opened vs closed per week” — the roughly 440 opened-issues spike around late May compresses
    the usual weekly bars (generally tens of issues), making normal opened-versus-closed comparisons difficult
    to read.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: FRM-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: 'All visible time series: “Open issues over time,” “Opened vs closed per week,” and “New issues
    answered within 48 hours,” including their first and last periods against the 2026-10-14 as-of date.'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked all chart titles, legends, axes, tick labels, and plotted labels in the full-resolution
    tiles.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked whether overlapping text appears in three or more charts.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: 'Triage queue — oldest first table: "[FEAT] [VSCE] Prefer parent errors over downs..." | Triage
    queue — oldest first table: "[FEAT] [VSCE] double-clicking a model from a..." | Triage queue — oldest
    first table: "[FEAT] Add ability to output `show` results as ..." | Triage queue — oldest first table:
    "[FEAT] Report on adapter.execute calls at pars..." | Triage queue — oldest first table: "[FEAT] Support
    All Purpose Compute Clusters ..." | Most-requested open issues table: "Expose a Python API with Rust
    bindings, enab..." | Most-requested open issues table: "[v2 Bug] BigQuery: nested column description..."
    | Most-requested open issues table: "[FEAT] Highlight the current model in the line..." | Open epics
    by % of sub-issues closed table: "[EPIC] BigQuery Structured and Semi-Structur..." | Open epics by
    % of sub-issues closed table: "[EPIC] [Databricks] Data Sketching Functions (..." | Open epics by
    % of sub-issues closed table: "[EPIC] [Databricks] Semi-structured & Variant ..." | Open epics by
    % of sub-issues closed table: "[EPIC] [Databricks] Conditional & Type Conver..." | Open epics by %
    of sub-issues closed table: "[EPIC] [Databricks] Array, Map & Window Func..." | Open epics by % of
    sub-issues closed table: "[EPIC] [SPAN] Incorrect or missing error/warni..."'
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked text at the full-resolution tile size, including supporting copy, ticks, legends,
    and table text.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LEG-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked the stacked-area, grouped-bar, stacked-bar, and line charts for indistinguishable
    marks caused by insufficient chart size.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked headline tiles, chart axes, legends, subtitles, and table columns for unlabeled currency,
    percentages, counts, or durations.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked titles, axes, legends, and table headers for raw field names, codes, or placeholders.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked whether the page states its subject and a reporting period/date.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked each headline tile for a period on the tile or elsewhere on the page; the page gives
    “Data as of 2026-10-14.”
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked all visible charts and tables for descriptive titles or labels.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked visible rates and shares for their denominator/basis. The response chart states “By
    week opened; unanswered issues count as misses,” and the epic table shows Closed and Sub-issues alongside
    “% complete.”
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-08
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Checked chart titles, axes, legends, and plotted measures for mismatches or contradictions.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LBL-09
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “Top 15, excluding unassigned” — the visible “Open issues by assignee” chart shows only eight
    assignee rows (serramattuu through ragesh-g) before the page ends.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: The KPI-card section has a half-empty second row containing only “Customer-reported open,”
    leaving the rest of that row blank
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-02
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Alignment of KPI cards, charts, tables, and section edges
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Visual order and relative space given to summary versus detail
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-05
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Visual weight of card borders, fills, shadows, and other decoration
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Whether colors have explained, consistent data encodings
  round: 1
- criterion_id: LAY-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: Unexplained vertical stack of small gray dash marks to the far right of the “Opened vs closed
    per week” chart
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-01
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Page title, section headings, and charts for a written conclusion supported by a chart.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-03
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “Open issues 511” — “+52 in 28 days” | “Opened / closed (28d) 123 / 71”
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-04
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Time-series and comparison charts for an annotation, target line, or a single visually highlighted
    subject.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-06
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Chart color treatment across the dashboard.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-07
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'no'
  evidence: Multi-series charts for direct labeling of series at line ends or on marks rather than reliance
    on a legend.
  round: 1
- criterion_id: EXC-08
  judge: gpt-5.6-terra
  sample: 0
  verdict: 'yes'
  evidence: “Open engine:v2 issues in dbt-labs/dbt-core (epics excluded unless noted)” | “Complete weeks;
    when closed > opened the backlog shrank” | “By week opened; unanswered issues count as misses” | “Issues
    with several areas count in each” | “(none) = adapter-agnostic” | “Top 15, excluding unassigned”
  round: 1